strange tale of the Runcorn Ghost
'Ghost', which in 1952 baffled not only that Merseyside town but
the whole of the north-west of England and beyond, was not in fact
a ghost at all but a Poltergeist which, literally translated from
the German, means ' a racketing or noisy spirit'.
Poltergeists in one form or another have plagued man ever since
he first occupied the earth and, for all our so-called progress
and rejection of old wives' tales, they abound today as freely as
they did in past centuries. Whereas a ghost haunts, a poltergeist
is said to infest.
Those who have been unfortunate enough to have a poltergeist infestation
in their home or workplace need all the sympathy one can give them.
Such things when served up as 'entertainment' in late night television
programmes, along with tales of vampires, werewolves and other horrors,
may merely mystify the general public in passing, but encounters
with them in real life can prove a living nightmare.
It was in August, 1952, that young John Glynn Jones and his family,
living in Byron Street, Runcorn, first came face to face with what
was then called the supernatural, now more clinically known as the
paranormal. John, aged 17, was an apprentice draughtsman employed
by the I.C.I. at their Weston Point establishment.
He was a well-behaved, rather serious young man interested only
in getting on with his job and studies with a view to qualifying
as a draughtsman, and he was regarded by his family, friends and
colleagues as normal in every way, though of a retiring disposition.
The trouble began in mid-August, 1952, when the tenant of No.1 Byron
Street, Mr Sam Jones (aged 68), his sister-in-law Mrs Lucy Jones,
his grandchildren John and Eileen Glynn, and a middle aged spinster
lodging in the house were joined for the weekend by Mrs Jones's
son and his wife on a visit from North Wales.
Mr Sam Jones and young John had to share a double bed in one bedroom
while Lucy Jones and young Eileen shared another bed in the same
No sooner had they got into bed and were trying to get to sleep
than the dressing-table started to make noises. The noises got louder
and louder until all four occupants were driven from the room, then
silence reigned for the time being.
When they returned to their beds the noises started up again and
there was no more sleep for any of them. The next night was even
worse, with the dressing-table drawers sounding as if they were
being pulled out, rattled and slammed back again.
Again the nuisance stopped when the occupants left the bedroom but
started up again when they returned to their beds there. This time
the dressing-table moved about a foot from the wall of its own accord.
As usually happens in cases of such phenomena, John was the first
suspect, guilty of a teenage hoax, and before many more wakeful
nights had passed he was subjected to all kinds of tests to find
out whether he was the cause of it all.
Proof that John was not the guilty party was forthcoming when, despite
four witnesses actually sitting on him as he lay in bed, the manifestations
continued in their presence.
A widely held theory among authorities on the subject is that where
there is poltergeist-type activity some teenager, usually a female,
is being used as a nexus or agent by the poltergeist entity, which
draws on their psychic energy, unknown to the victim, to create
the various manifestations.
One might call such entities invisible vandals, though the annoyance
caused and the actual damage done is anything but invisible. The
poltergeist is a pastmaster at sound effects, moving some solid
objects and levitating others.
In some cases on record candles and coals have been fired like bullets
into walls and ceilings, glass and china smashed, doors and windows
rattled and flung open, however securely they have been fastened.
The Byron Street phenomena occurred in cycles, peaceful interludes
alternating with spells of pandemonium.
Anyone wishing to read a blow by blow account of this case has only
to turn up the files of the 'Runcorn Guardian' for August, September,
October 1952, where the ten-week run of strange happenings is recorded.
Advice and offers of help came from all over the world, as did curious
visitors. One letter was from Germany enclosing a formula for exorcism.
Unfortunately the envelope had been opened in transit and one of
the four vital pieces of paper was found to be missing.
Exorcism rarely works in such cases but it was claimed that this
formula had been used with success in a German poltergeist outbreak
which had lasted 15 months.
Mr Sam Jones said that he had lived in the house for 35 years and
had had the dressing-table for 42 years but he had never known anything
like it before. Even when the drawers were sealed with adhesive
paper they continued to rattle and the mirror swung backwards and
forwards on its pivots.
Three burly policemen were thrown off an empty chest on the landing
and soon realised that the 'disorderly conduct' at No.1 was something
outside their knowledge and control.
At one stage a spiritualist medium, Mr Francis, was called in and
a seance held but they only seemed to make matters worse. Two bibles,
a picture-book, a tin of ointment and a table cover were thrown
about the bedroom in front of witnesses. There followed a quiet
period which enabled the family to catch up on some sleep, but early
in September the 'ghost' returned with a vengeance. One witness
reported that a clock and several other items moved a distance of
five feet across the bedroom in his presence.
Later in September there were more violent happenings and at one
point John was lifted out of his bed and deposited on the floor.
By this time the London based Society for Psychical Research started
to take an interest and several members were invited to come and
observe the phenomena for themselves.
One member with whom I became friendly, was the Rev. W H Stevens,
a local Methodist minister, who was appointed the society's official
investigator. On entering this haunted house he was welcomed by
being hit on the head with a dictionary.
Mr Steven's theory, a familiar one in the world of the paranormal,
was that the force responsible for all these mischievous manifestations
was being exerted, albeit unwittingly, by John Glynn himself. It
was the result of a build up of repressed energy, such as one finds
in a teenager, being abused by an evil entity. After each display
of phenomena it took time for the 'accumulator' containing this
energy to recoup before the next outburst.
There have been - and still are - scores of parallel cases, but
whether the energy in question is of a psychic, sexual, or some
other nature is not yet known. He ruled out the possibility that
what was happening could be some form of hoax.
At times, as many as fourteen observers were witnesses to the levitation
of household objects, the breaking of china and general vandalism.
The kitchen ceiling under the bedroom began to crack and the laths
In the belief that the whole matter was getting out of hand, the
house was closed to random investigators and press reporters. Friends
invited John Glynn to their house in Frodsham, a nearby village,
where they held an outdoor lunch party to give him some relaxation
from the strain and suffering. One of the guests noted that a glass
of lemonade being poured for John burst in the hostess's hand; none
of the lemonade fell on the floor but John was drenched in it.
Long after the phenomena ceased, sometime in October, I came across
a small item in a magazine which said that the total cost of the
damage done by the poltergeist at No1 Byron Street and surrounding
properties, including a neighbouring pig farm, had been estimated
As usual in such cases, there was no satisfactory explanation as
to the cause of all the trouble and damage caused.
The SPR investigator, the local spiritualist organisation, and the
several independent psychic 'detectives' could not agree on the
origin of the phenomena, or on what an ordinary, quiet living family
could have done to invite the attentions of some evil force to wreak
its vengeance on their household and disturb their lives in this
At the end of ten weeks of infestation only the visible cracks in
the fabric of the building reminded the passer-by what an invisible
vandal can do.
BACK TO ARCHIVES